TTrialPathMatch Me to Trials
← Back to trials
RecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia

Comparing Cytarabine + Daunorubicin Therapy Versus Cytarabine + Daunorubicin + Venetoclax Versus Venetoclax + Azacitidine in Younger Patients With Intermediate Risk AML (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)

Eligible age

18–59 yrs

Accepts

All genders

Locations

40 states

Healthy volunteers

No

See if you qualify for this study

Answer a few quick questions about your location and health. Takes about a minute.

Check my eligibility →

About this study

This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares cytarabine with daunorubicin versus cytarabine with daunorubicin and venetoclax versus venetoclax with azacitidine for the treatment of younger patients with intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytarabine is a drug that inhibits some of the enzymes needed for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and repair and can slow or stop the growth of cancer cells. Daunorubicin is a drug that blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and DNA repair, and it may kill cancer cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Azacitidine is a drug that interacts with DNA to activate tumor-suppressing genes, resulting in an anti-tumor effect. Adding venetoclax to cytarabine and daunorubicin, and adding venetoclax to azacitidine, may work better than the usual treatment of cytarabine with daunorubicin alone. To decide if they are better, the study doctors are looking to see if venetoclax increases the rate of elimination of AML in participants by 20% or more compared to the usual approach.

Sponsor: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

You may qualify if…

  • Participants must have been registered to master screening and re-assessment protocol (MYELOMATCH) prior to consenting to this study. Participants must have been assigned to this clinical trial, via MATCHBox Protocol Assignment Team, prior to registration to this study. Participants must have agreed to have specimens submitted for translational medicine and must be offered the opportunity to submit biosamples for banking for future research as per MYELOMATCH
  • Note: Pre-enrollment/diagnosis labs must have already been performed under MYELOMATCH
  • Previously untreated, de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) defined by \>= 20% myeloblasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow (as defined by the current World Health Organization \[WHO\] classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia) excluding all the following categories of AML:
  • Favorable cytogenetics: (t(8;21)q22;q22.1); RUNX1-RUNX1T1, inversion 16(p13.1;q22), t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11
  • CEBPA biallelic mutations
  • NPM1 mutation
  • AML with PML-RARalpha
  • AML with any adverse cytogenetics, TP53 mutation, RUNX1 mutation, ASXL1, 11q23/KMT2 rearrangements

You may not qualify if…

  • Prior therapy for AML except for hydroxyurea and leukapheresis to control blood counts. The use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is permitted until a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia, if suspected, is ruled out
  • Patients who are receiving any other investigational agents
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to cytarabine, daunorubicin, azacitidine, venetoclax
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because venetoclax, cytarabine and azacitidine have the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with venetoclax, cytarabine and azacitidine breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with venetoclax, cytarabine and azacitidine. These potential risks may also apply to other agents used in this study
  • Patients with isolated myeloid sarcoma are not eligible
  • Any other serious intercurrent illness, life threatening condition, organ system dysfunction, or medical condition judged by the local investigator to compromise the subject's safety (for example):
  • Active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal, or viral infection

Where it's recruiting

Alabama

Birmingham

Arizona

Tucson

Arkansas

Little Rock

California

Berkeley · Los Angeles · San Francisco

Florida

Miami · Pembroke Pines

Georgia

Albany

Idaho

Boise · Caldwell · Coeur d'Alene · Fruitland

Illinois

Centralia · Chicago · Decatur · Effingham

Indiana

Crown Point

Iowa

Iowa City

Kansas

Fairway · Kansas City · Overland Park · Westwood

Kentucky

Lexington · Louisville

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT05554393 · last updated 2026-08-11

Comparing Cytarabine + Daunorubicin Therapy Versus Cytarabine + Daunor · TrialPath